Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://elib.utmn.ru/jspui/handle/ru-tsu/16702
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorD. Van Loggerenberg ; University of Pretoriaen-US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-16T09:30:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-16T09:30:12Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-15-
dc.identifierhttps://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/76-
dc.identifier2412-2343-
dc.identifier2409-9058-
dc.identifier.urihttps://elib.utmn.ru/jspui/handle/ru-tsu/16702-
dc.descriptionThe South African adversarial system of civil procedure in the High Court owes its origin to that of England. As with all civil procedural systems, the South African system is not stagnant. Its primary sources, namely Acts of Parliament and rules of court, are constantly amended in an attempt to meet the changing needs of society. Court delay and costinefficient procedural mechanisms, however, contribute to public dismay. The High Court, in the exercise of its inherent power to regulate its process, do so with the purpose of enhancing access to justice. The advantage of the system lies in the fact that it is not cast in stone but could, subject to the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, be developed to make it more accessible to the public whilst protecting the public’s fundamental rights entrenched in the Constitution and, in this regard, particularly the right to afair trial embedded in sec. 34 of the Constitution. This contribution gives an overview of the system with reference to the court structure, the judiciary, the process in the High Court and its underlying principles, appeals, class actions and alternative civil dispute resolution mechanisms.en-US
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherPublishing House V.Емаen-US
dc.rightsAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).en-US
dc.rightsАвторы, публикующие в данном журнале, соглашаются со следующим:Авторы сохраняют за собой авторские права на работу и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution License, которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы сохраняют право заключать отдельные контрактные договорённости, касающиеся не-эксклюзивного распространения версии работы в опубликованном здесь виде (например, размещение ее в институтском хранилище, публикацию в книге), со ссылкой на ее оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (См. The Effect of Open Access).ru-RU
dc.source.urihttps://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/76/65
dc.subjectcourt structuresen-US
dc.subjectjudiciaryen-US
dc.subjectcivil procedure in the High Courten-US
dc.subjectappealsen-US
dc.subjectclass actionsen-US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen-US
dc.titleCIVIL JUSTICE IN SOUTH AFRICAen-US
dc.titleBRICS Law Journal; Vol 3, No 4 (2016); 125-147en-US
dc.titleЮридический журнал БРИКС; Vol 3, No 4 (2016); 125-147ru-RU
dc.typeArticle-
dc.typePublished Version-
dc.date.updated2018-12-16 14:38:13
dc.url.fulltexthttps://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/download/76/65
dc.identifier.doi10.21684/2412-2343-2016-3-4-125-147
dc.identifier.doi10.21684/2412-2343-2016-3-4
Appears in Collections:BRICS Law Journal

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
76-137-1-SM.pdf161,47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.