Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://elib.utmn.ru/jspui/handle/ru-tsu/16708
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSharma, P. R. D.en
dc.contributor.editorMaleshin, D.en
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-16T09:30:13Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-16T09:30:13Z-
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationSharma, P. R. D. Comparative federalism with reference to constitutional machinery failure (emergency) in India and Pakistan / P. R. D. Sharma // BRICS Law Journal / chief editor D. Maleshin; deputy chief editor S. Marochkin; executive editor E. Gladun. – 2017. – Vol. 4, No. 2. – P. 71-94.en
dc.identifier.issn2412-2343online
dc.identifier.issn2409-9058print
dc.description.abstractThe constitutions and courts both in India and in Pakistan have shown their aspirations and fundamental faith in the federal structure but in practice there is a strong centripetal bias in each of their constitutional-political structures. This bias becomes more evident when the constitution sanctions power to the centre to proclaim emergency situations in the provinces on the basis of Constitutional Machinery Failure. Emerging from their colonial roots, the constitutions of India and Pakistan contain an identical provision on Constitutional Machinery Failure Emergency which has been misused and abused regularly and has been the biggest question mark on federal claims of the two States. This unique system of Constitutional Machinery Failure Emergency has also gone through a number of radical changes in India and Pakistan, which often have been influenced by each other. The article specifies the socio-political-constitutional background of Constitutional Machinery Failure resulting in Provincial Emergency, both in India and in Pakistan, their respective use and abuse by the Executive, legislative attempts to amend and control such power, and judicial response, with similarities and differences in respect of justifiability of such Emergency Proclamations.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherPublishing House V.Емаen
dc.relation.ispartofBRICS Law Journal. – 2017. – T. 4, Vol. 2en
dc.rightsAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.en
dc.rightsАвторы, публикующие в данном журнале, соглашаются со следующим: Авторы сохраняют за собой авторские права на работу и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution License, которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале. Авторы сохраняют право заключать отдельные контрактные договорённости, касающиеся не-эксклюзивного распространения версии работы в опубликованном здесь виде (например, размещение ее в институтском хранилище, публикацию в книге), со ссылкой на ее оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале. Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу.ru
dc.subjectIndiaen
dc.subjectPakistanen
dc.subjectcomparative federalismen
dc.subjectConstitutional Failure Emergency Modelen
dc.subjectConstitutional Machinery Failure Emergencyen
dc.subjectdefunct federalismen
dc.subjectdefunct democracyen
dc.titleComparative federalism with reference to constitutional machinery failure (emergency) in India and Pakistanen
dc.title.alternativeСравнительный федерализм со ссылкой на сбой конституционного механизма (чрезвычайная ситуация) в Индии и Пакистанеru
dc.typeArticleen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen
local.description.firstpage71
local.description.lastpage94
local.issue2
local.volume4
local.identifier.uuid7207ac3a-83fa-4b51-8906-b29575a0d902-
local.identifier.handleru-tsu/16708-
dc.identifier.doi10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-2-71-94
dc.identifier.doi10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-2
Appears in Collections:BRICS Law Journal

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
99-178-1-SM.pdfnull175.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.