Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorA. Tyrtyshny ; Russian New University, Moscowen-US
dc.contributor.authorS. Tomas ; Russian New University, Moscowen-US
dc.descriptionThis article provides an overview of certain ideologemes of Western (European) and Russian legal consciousness – prominent works of Ivan Ilyin and Duncan Kennedy are taken as examples. The article analyzes the tabula rasa principle and its place in legal consciousness. We use legal scholarship, judicial practice and opinion polls to examine the relationship between legal consciousness and the lack of trust in Russian courts, as well as their inefficiency from the point of view of public opinion. There are a number of shocking cases of torture of innocent people by the Russian police. Why is this so? The answer lies in the legal consciousness of police officers and of judges. This is something that has been inherited from the Soviet period. It is completely different from the Western legal consciousness, one of the key features of which is denial of authority. The critical legal studies branch of American legal realism almost denies the very existence of law, and, perhaps for this reason, American culture is less open to abuses like torture. At the same time, there is no possibility to shift legal consciousness immediately, the tabula rasa principle does not work. The final objective of the article is to provide a perspective on the reform of higher legal education and its relation to legal consciousness and legal anthropology. We propose that a greater part of the university curriculum is devoted to legal anthropology.en-US
dc.publisherPublishing House V.Емаen-US
dc.relationKennedy, Duncan. American Constitutionalism as Civil Religion: Notes of an Atheist, 19 Nova L. Rev. 909 (1995), available at < pdf> (accessed Feb. 4, 2016).-
dc.relationKennedy, Duncan. Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy: A Polemic against the System (AFAR 1983).-
dc.relationTomas, Stanislovas. Le raisonnement judiciaire de la Cour européenne de justice et de la Cour européenne des droits de l’Homme dans la perspective chamanique proposée par les études critiques du droit 851 (université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne 2010).-
dc.relationTomas, Stanislovas. Theory of Judicial Shamanism, in Logic, Argumentation and Interpretation / Logica, Argumentacion e Interpretacion: 5 Proceedings of the 22nd IVR World Congress granada 2005 (= 110 ARSP Beiheft) 125 (Josep Aguiló-Regla, ed.) (Steiner Verlag; Nomos 2007).-
dc.relationЗорькин В.Д. Кризис международного права: современный контекст // Российская газета. 2014. 20 июня [Zorkin V.D. Krizis mezhdunarodnogo prava: sovremennyi kontekst // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 2014. 20 iyunya [Valery D. Zorkin, Crisis of International Law: Contemporary Context, Russian gazette, Jun. 20, 2014]].-
dc.relationЗорькин В.Д. Цивилизация права // Российская газета. 2014. 13 марта [Zorkin V.D. Tsivilizatsiya prava // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 2014. 13 marta [Valery D. Zorkin, Civilization of Law, Russian gazette, Mar. 13, 2014]].-
dc.relationИльин И.А. Против России // Ильин И.А. Наши задачи. Статьи 1948–1954 гг. Т. 1 [Ilyin I.A. Protiv Rossii // Ilyin I.A. Nashi zadachi. Stat’i 1948–1954 gg. T. 1 [Ivan A. Ilyin, Against Russia, in Ivan A. Ilyin, 1 Our Tasks. Articles of 1948–54]] 86, 87–88 (Airis-press 2008).-
dc.rightsAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).en-US
dc.rightsАвторы, публикующие в данном журнале, соглашаются со следующим:Авторы сохраняют за собой авторские права на работу и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution License, которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы сохраняют право заключать отдельные контрактные договорённости, касающиеся не-эксклюзивного распространения версии работы в опубликованном здесь виде (например, размещение ее в институтском хранилище, публикацию в книге), со ссылкой на ее оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу (См. The Effect of Open Access).ru-RU
dc.subjectlegal cultureen-US
dc.subjectlegal consciousnessen-US
dc.subjecttheory of state and lawen-US
dc.subjectpractice and jurisprudenceen-US
dc.subjectpsychology of lawen-US
dc.subjectlegal educationen-US
dc.titleBRICS Law Journal; Vol 2, No 2 (2015); 34-49en-US
dc.titleЮридический журнал БРИКС; Vol 2, No 2 (2015); 34-49ru-RU
dc.typePublished Version- 14:46:00
Appears in Collections:BRICS Law Journal

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
15-26-1-SM.pdf125,01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.