Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://elib.utmn.ru/jspui/handle/ru-tsu/16671
Title: | Small claim and summary procedure in China |
Other Titles: | Мелкие претензии и упрощенная процедура в Китае |
Authors: | Yulin Fu |
Keywords: | civil procedure small claim small claim procedure summary procedure summary judgment |
Issue Date: | 2014 |
Publisher: | Publishing House V.Ема |
Citation: | Yulin Fu. Small claim and summary procedure in China / Yulin Fu // BRICS Law Journal / chief editor D. Maleshin; deputy chief editor S. Marochkin; executive editor E. Gladun. – 2014. – Vol. 1, No. 1. – P. 67-81. |
Abstract: | In Mainland China, summary procedure is procedure applied at the first instance by basic-level courts and their detached tribunals. As simplified formal procedure, summary procedure can be classified into three types: 1) general / mandatory summary procedure, which is applied to cases with clear facts, unambiguous rights and obligations and minor disputes; 2) consensus procedure, which is applied to cases other than those to which mandatory summary procedure is applied, with the parties’ agreement on the application; 3) special summary procedure, which is ‘small claim procedure’ applied to cases involving amounts lower than 30 percent of the previous year’s average annual wages of workers in a given province and the judgment of the basic-level court or detached tribunal shall be final. |
URI: | https://elib.utmn.ru/jspui/handle/ru-tsu/16671 |
ISSN: | 2412-2343 2409-9058 |
Source: | BRICS Law Journal. – 2014. – T. 1, Vol. 1 |
Appears in Collections: | BRICS Law Journal
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.