Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|National policy for academic mobility in Russia and the BRICS countries: 20 years of the Bologna process implementation
|Национальная политика академической мобильности в России и странах БРИКС: 20 лет реализации Болонского процесса
Russian Federal Education Programmes
outward and incoming mobility
internationalisation of education
credit and degree mobility
|Publishing House V.Ема
|Teplyakova, O. National policy for academic mobility in Russia and the BRICS countries: 20 years of the Bologna process implementation / O. Teplyakova, D. Teplyakov // BRICS Law Journal / chief editor D. Maleshin; deputy chief editor S. Marochkin; executive editor E. Gladun. – 2018. – Vol. 5, No. 1. – P. 5-26.
|The article analyses the Russian Federal Education Programmes from the aspect of their impact on student and academic staff mobility. The subject of the analysis is the programmes adopted for the period 2000 to 2020 and their implementation reports. A cluster of academic mobility forms compiled by the authors is based on two groups: academic staff and students. The forms of academic staff mobility have been identified as: (1) a migration flow: outward and incoming; and (2) purpose: teaching and research. The forms of student mobility have been identified as: (1) migration flow: outward and incoming; and (2) purpose: credit mobility and degree mobility. The cluster is based on the National Reports on the Implementation of the Bologna Process by different countries from 2012 to 2015 and the Russian Federal Education Programmes. The analysis finds that academic mobility in Russia has been an indicator of the development of education programmes for almost 20 years. During this period, the government’s approach to academic mobility has undergone a change from a simple reference as an expected result to the establishing of quantitative indicators. The four quantitative indicators of academic mobility have been in place since 2000. As a result of the analysis, the authors conclude that among the forms of student mobility the most developed is the incoming degree mobility of international students. The student outward credit mobility is the least developed of the four indicators. In the current situation, it is necessary to reform and liberalise the recognition of study abroad periods for Russian students. Without reform, it will be difficult to achieve the target set by the government to have 6 percent of students studying abroad for at least one semester by 2020. The data for 2016 show that only a few higher education institutions have approached the target. The authors also identify problems relating to academic staff mobility.
|BRICS Law Journal. – 2018. – T. 5, Vol. 1
|Appears in Collections:
|BRICS Law Journal
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.