DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Mwangi, J. G. | en |
dc.contributor.editor | Maleshin, D. | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-12-16T09:30:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-12-16T09:30:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Mwangi, J. G. The case of Chinese constitutional polity with Chinese characteristics: can China and Eritrea dialogue? / J. G. Mwangi // BRICS Law Journal / chief editor D. Maleshin; deputy chief editor S. Marochkin; executive editor E. Gladun. – 2017. – Vol. 4, No. 3. – P. 35-61. | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 2412-2343 | online |
dc.identifier.issn | 2409-9058 | print |
dc.description.abstract | This paper subsumes the mysticism of Chinese law by distinguishing it from other bodies of law, while also rendering it transcendental in the contemporary universal legal context. It is also an attempt to romanticize Chinese constitutional law, as afertile ground that can be used to re-thread the fabric of Eritrean constitutional order. The root of this research is nournished by an extravagance of ideas and desires, which if applied can make the ubiquity and plasticity of the rule of law flow across what is perceived to be “unyielding” borders. Eritrea has just turned twenty-five and despite a tangled post-independence period, the country has been successful in articulating and advancing the vision of the pre-independence generation. Today, Eritrea envisages rejuvenating its governance with a new constitution that not only talks to post-independence Eritreans, but also triggers sustainable development with substantive emphasis on the rule of law. Eritrean endeavours can easily open up to the seductive appeal of the rich conceptual enigma of Chinese constitutional polity, China being one of the countries with the oldest legal traditions in the world. It is axiomatic that Chinese constitution-centred governance, which is well adorned with Chinese characteristics, is pre-eminent, for it has influenced China since 1949 to aptly rise as the world’s second largest economy. This paper illustrates that Eritrean constitutional polity can be examined through a Chinese lens, to be calibrated in such a way as to exhibit Eritrean characteristics, and still govern by the rule of law. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Publishing House V.Ема | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | BRICS Law Journal. – 2017. – T. 4, Vol. 3 | en |
dc.rights | Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. | en |
dc.rights | Авторы, публикующие в данном журнале, соглашаются со следующим: Авторы сохраняют за собой авторские права на работу и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution License, которая позволяет другим распространять данную работу с обязательным сохранением ссылок на авторов оригинальной работы и оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале. Авторы сохраняют право заключать отдельные контрактные договорённости, касающиеся не-эксклюзивного распространения версии работы в опубликованном здесь виде (например, размещение ее в институтском хранилище, публикацию в книге), со ссылкой на ее оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале. Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в сети Интернет (например в институтском хранилище или персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу. | ru |
dc.subject | PRC | en |
dc.subject | China | en |
dc.subject | Eritrea | en |
dc.subject | constitutional polity | en |
dc.subject | constitutional governance | en |
dc.subject | rule of law | en |
dc.subject | developing countries | en |
dc.title | The case of Chinese constitutional polity with Chinese characteristics: can China and Eritrea dialogue? | en |
dc.title.alternative | Пример китайского конституционного устройства с китайскими особенностями: может ли Китай и Эритрея вести диалог? | ru |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | en |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | en |
local.description.firstpage | 35 | |
local.description.lastpage | 61 | |
local.issue | 3 | |
local.volume | 4 | |
local.identifier.uuid | 233fb612-166c-46d4-a874-398138c411bf | - |
local.identifier.handle | ru-tsu/16747 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-3-35-61 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-3 | |
Appears in Collections: | BRICS Law Journal
|